Sept. 7, 2013

David Irving’s long-promised but still to be published book on Heinrich Himmler will be “his story” of the man, as it is often said that history is telling stories and making them interesting.  In a video of one of Irving’s private meetings with ticket purchasers, he tells them:

• He has “Jewish friends” with whom he agrees there were “extermination camps” for Jews;
• Himmler’s wife was “predatory” and “got her claws into him,” says Irving, when this is not objectively supported by facts;
• Himmler’s writing to a woman, “There are certain things that I have to do for Germany’s sake that are not very nice,” is proof to Irving that Himmler was doing unspeakable things;
• Selected telegrams intercepted by the British are used by Irving to “prove” that Jews who were being transported East did not reach their intended destination but were killed in the so-called Reinhardt camps;
• The total number killed in Operaton Reinhardt" was 1,274,166, says Irving;
• "Last source" for Irving’s beliefs is what he calls the English Interrogation Center where top German prisoners talked freely together (unaware of hidden microphones) and some described Jews being shot;
• Juergen Graf refuted Irving’s extermination theories all the way back in 2009, but Irving persists;
• Napola schools required it’s students to be racially flawless, with above average intelligence and appropriate competitiveness — preparing the future leaders for the Reich, including the military, SS and police.
• This is what all national governments try to do – somewhat comparable to West Point, Anapolis, etc. in the U.S.

Image: Cover of David Irving's 2012 DVD, $20

Sept. 9, 2013

Carolyn covers several topics with the common thread of the overwhelming presence of Jews in our lives and societies. For instance:

• Kenneth Waltzer’s Michigan State University-sponsored exhibition extolling Michigan's Jews and how their well-being was threateed by “Nazism” in Europe and World War II;
• Compare treatment of Hitler bodyguard Rochas Misch after the war with that of Hitler assassin Ewald-Heinrich von Kleist-Schmenzin who went on to become a major globalist and American stooge;
• Nephew of the Jew who captured Rudolf Höss discovers his daughter Brigitte living undetected in Northern Virginia and gets interview;
• The White Rose Society was made up of a few U. of Munich medical students who came from families that were anti-Hitler, strongly religious and Jew-friendly;
• They distributed leaflets during 1942-43 calling for military defeat in order to accomplish the overthrow of the National-Socialist regime, and have been glorified as martyrs in post-war Germany, similar to the "Valkyrie" July 20 conspirators;
• Ringleader and half-Russian Alexander Schmorell has even been made a New Martyr by the “Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia.”

Image: From the exhibition "Uneasy Years: Michigan Jewry during Depression and War:" Announcing the 9th Jewish-owned Winkelman's Dept. Store to open in Detroit, Mich. in 1940. Retailing in the Midwest had long been in the hands of the Jews, while they comprised 8/10 of 1% of the Michigan population.

Sept. 14, 2013

The original members of the White Rose Society were all Christian, born around 1918 into devout families, who resented the emphasis on “service to the state” that National-Socialism was built around.

• Hans Scholl‘s father was a minor Social-Democrat, anti-Hitler politician, his mother a Lutheran lay preacher, and Hans was always forming and being active in groups;
• Sophie Scholl wanted to be a part of her brother’s secret group and was influenced by the writings of Catholic Cardinal Neumann on the duty to obey one’s conscience;
• Alexander Schmorell was Russian-born, a faithful son of the Orthodox Church, who never felt “at home” in Germany, where he wanted to bring about a revolution;
• Willi Graf was a Roman Catholic who didn’t like the way Church groups were replaced by Nat-Soc groups, and felt strongly enough to do something about it;
• Christof Probst‘s father’s second wife was Jewish; his father associated with “decadent” artists of society, so Christof fell in naturally with the White Rose;
• Hitler understood by 1941-44 that official Christianity could not bend toward a national state, but was trapped in it’s universalist dogma wherein the Church’s duty was to transcend race and national boundaries and to speak for all people, everywhere;
• Hitler expressed his thoughts along these lines in many passages found in “Table Talk.”

Image: Alexander Schmorell, executed in the Third Reich for treason, is glorified as a  “New Martyr” by the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia. All the members of the White Rose Society have been glorified in film, media and other means in post-war Germany.

Sept. 16, 2013

Carolyn continues on the question of Adolf Hitler’s views on Christianity, the incompatibility of National-Socialism with certain Christian teachings, and opposition to the Third Reich from both Catholic and Protestant Church leaders.

• The Eurozone vultures await the German national elections, hoping that Merkel’s win will make her ready to betray the German people for “Europe”;
• The White Rose Society members were listening to foreign radio broadcasts and associating with communists and the Lutheran Bonhoeffer family;
• The Reichskonkordat of 1933 between the Catholic  Church in Germany and the Hitler govt. guaranteed the “rights of the Church” ;
• The greatest concern of the Church was protection for Catholic education;
• In 1937 Pope Pius XI sent the Mit brennender Sorge (With Burning Concern) encyclical to all the German Catholic churches in secret, criticizing the Hitler regime for racism, pantheism, neo-paganism, idolatry of the state, and rejection of baptised Jews;
• The encyclical was read in all Catholics churches on Palm Sunday, infuriating the Hitler government which retaliated by conducting investigations into homosexuality and debauchery of Catholic clergy;
• Hitler’s “Table Talk” appears to be the authentic Hitler in the years 1941-1944 wherein he expresses his personal alienation from Christian belief;
• All in all, there is a fundamental conflict between the Christian world view and the National-Socialist world view, concludes Carolyn.
  

Image: Hitler with Archbishop Cesare Orsenigo, the papal nunco in Berlin, 1935

Oct. 7, 2013

Carolyn takes on a difficult subject and attempts to make the point that Adolf Hitler embodied and worked for all things that were beneficial to the White European people. If we are also committed to what is good for us as White people, we should only praise Hitler and unify behind him as behind a single great idea. If one decides to criticize this or that aspect of his policies and/or decisions to the extent of making him the cause of failure of National-Socialism or the loss of the war, that greatly damages our strength as a unified force.  Instead of criticizing Hitler, we should be seeking to understand him because he was smarter than we are! Related topics covered:

• Paul Eisen, the Jewish blogger who claims “I am a Holocaust Denier,” reveals how deep is the hatred of Jews for National Socialism, ergo Adolf Hitler;
• Eisen celebrates the "deep, emotional, spiritual affiliation" Jews have with their Jewishness (while living in non-Jew countries) but doesn’t seem to recognize that Europeans also have the same affiliation for their own historical/ethnic identity;
• According to Eisen, even well-integrated Jews feel it’s normal to feel fear and disdain for their non-Jewish neighbors – because in their minds antisemitism never goes away;
• German Foreign Ministry wants to honor a German communist Ilse Stöbe, who was a Soviet spy asset from 1931 on, calling her a member of the “anti-Nazi Resistance”;
• The People’s Court judgement against White Rose defendants  Schmorell, Huber and Graf sheds light on the nature and rationale of a National-Socialist state (especially in time of war).
  

Oct. 14, 2013

Carolyn takes selections from Carlo Mattogno’s chapter 5 and 6 in The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt” that deal with Holocauster’s claims of “decimation by labor;” “local exterminations” which took place before the “final solution” was given by Hitler allegedly between Dec. 7 and 14, 1941 (Pearl Harbor!); Himmler’s order to shoot the Jews in Pinsk; Hitler’s comments to Hungary’s Horthy on “burning his bridges” and Jews likened to bacilli and pests. Some other important points:

• In the occupied territories, the Germans needed to direct the Jews from the countryside into the cities (ghettos) to lessen the danger of partisan activity;
• By far,  most of the shootings in the Soviet Union and Poland consisted of reprisals for guerrilla terrorism against Wehrmacht troops and supplies;
• The “Lorpicrin gassing” shows the kind of fake stories that are accepted by orthodox holocaust historians;
• Eichmann’s testimony for “gassings” at Chelmo, Treblinka or Belzec, used by holocausters, is useless because contradictory;
• German ministers serving  in the East had difficulty finding a way to deal with their dangerous Jews, as they could often not be sent somewhere else;
• Mattogno shows that Poles and Serbs were shot for partisan activity along with Jews – it was not a policy aimed at Jews alone;
• Hitler, in his meetings with Hungary’s Horthy in 1944, used the word “decay,” not "exterminate," in referring to the fate of the Jews who would not work.

Image: German troops in 1941 stopped before a German-posted sign that warns of “Partisans – Danger” and “hold (yourself) ready.” [For an enlarged view, go here.]

Nov. 11, 2013

The latest case of ” lost art found” is being opportunistically propagandized in the jewsmedia as “Nazi looting” and used in the current Jewish campaign warning of “the rise  of antisemitism.”

• 1400 lost or “stolen” artworks have been discovered in a Munich apartment and Jews are clamoring to claim them as belonging originally to their families;
• The Augsberg, Bavaria district attorney tried to keep it quiet as he investigated for tax fraud, and has been criticized for “covering up”;
• Some of the artworks were seized by the U.S. Military in 1945, but after an investigation were returned to Hildebrandt Gurlitt as the rightful owner in 1950;
• In 1956, many of these works toured the U.S. in an exhibition, with a catalog featuring the works, and there were no claims to ownership made;
•  The U.S. State Dept. has pressured Germany’s Federal Govt. to intervene into the Bavarian Prosecutor’s Office and force the publishing of details of the artworks (to please the Jews);
• Hitler rightly said that this new art was international, politically subversive and sold by Jews, and he had it removed from German museums;
• Dissension among Jews about the “new anti-Semitism,” which is described as “denial that Israel has a right to exist” or just “hatred of Israel.”

Image: Click for painting image only. Catalog of the exhibition that toured the U.S. shows Max Beckmann’s degenerate painting “Lion Tamer” which Gurlitt sold in Dec. 2011 for $1.2 million.

Nov. 18, 2013

How two United States ambassadors serving President Franklin Roosevelt worked to wreck feelings of trust between Poland’s Foreign Office under Josef Beck and the government of Adolf Hitler. German Historian Dr. Alfred Schickel’s paper “Germany and Poland in American secret documents” examines the secret memorandums and telegrams sent by Drexel Biddle, U.S. Ambassador to Poland, which contained secret conversations held by William C. Bullitt, U.S. Ambassador to France, with Joself Beck and other high-level Poles such as Marshall Ridz-Smigly. Some important points:

• Beck met three times with Ambassador to France Bullitt during his private visit to Warsaw in November 1937;
• The content of these and other conversations were contained in four “confidential memoranda” sent by Ambassador Biddle to Sec. of State Cordell Hull (and Roosevelt);
• Poland accepted Germany’s actions on behalf of the Sudetan Germans in Czechoslovakia in 1938, and the break-up of the Czech state, because through it she also gained autonomy for Poles in the Teschen region;
• Biddle’s secret telegram of March 29, 1939 revealed that the planned response by Beck to any specific suggestion from Berlin would now be a “dignified, polite but firm” no;
• The U.S. even deceived Poland about the “Secret Additional Protocol” signed by Ribbentrop and Molotov on Aug. 21, and so the British government signed the Anglo-Polish mutual assistance agreement on August 25, 1939.
  

Also, the latest developments in the persecution of  Cornelius Gurlitt and the“Looted Nazi Art” scam and why it is a scam.

Click image to enlarge: William C. Bullitt, first US Ambassador to the Soviet Union, 1933-1936; US Ambassador to France, 1936-1940, seated in car with FDR. Bullitt played a prominent role in giving Polish diplomats the “American view” in 1938-39.  His second wife, Louise Bryant, was the widow of John Reed, the famous American “Red.”

Dec. 2, 2013

In the first hour, Carolyn continues her criticism of  Mark Weber, and includes radio show hosts  Kyle Hunt, Rodney Martin and Deanna Spingola who have given Weber an easy time of it, rather than asking, and demanding answers to, tough questions. Mark Weber has been a disastrous director of the Institute for Historical Review and should be held accountable  for it. Rewarding people for failure and weakness is the absolute wrong thing to do if we are serious about turning things around for ourselves. [By the way, I forgot to mention I sent an email to MW on Sunday inviting him to come on my Saturday Afternoon program; he has not replied. I knew he wouldn't, but still, he could take the opportunity to defend himself ... if he had a defense.]

Second hour focuses on John Friend and his friendliness with Jews over quite a period of time. Why does he express himself as strongly as anyone does against Jews in White society, and at the same time link for no good reason to anti-Hitler websites run by Jews? John’s compulsion to have his finger in every pie leads to the conclusion that he is just dabbling and won’t last long in any of it. Carolyn finishes up with Adolf Hitler’s words in 1931 that “German life must be purged of all foreign (Jewish) elements that distort the true German Spirit.” Substitute Aryan for German.

Thanks to the Winston Smith Ministry of Truth blog for finding these terrific words of Adolf Hitler. I think they're so good I am posting the interview here also, to make sure as many people as possible will read it. 

It was published in The Jewish Criterion magazine of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in January 1931. A note about the story appeared in the February 6, 1931 magazine:

Berlin-- Adolf Hitler, founder and organizer of the Fascists of Germany, who elevated anti-Semitism into a respectable cult in this country, became rather angry when he was shown a copy of an interview on Jewish subjects which had been syndicated to the Jewish press of America by the Seven Arts Feature Syndicate. The interview, which had been obtained by a Berlin Correspondent of the Syndicate, quotes Hitler extensively on his anti-Jewish views.

Hitler, not denying the authenticity of the views he expressed, is upset because he did not realize that his ideas would be put between quotation marks. He thought that he was to be quoted indirectly. Hitler had always insisted that he would never give an interview to a Jew, and he had boasted that if a Jewish journalist wanted his words of wisdom he would have to pay five marks ($1.25) per word. He had not known when he started to give the interview that Max Fraenkel was Jewish, and he did not know that he was giving away precious words on anti-Semitism which he thinks should be paid for at the rate of a dollar and a quarter a word.

Adolf Hitler "Explains"

An Exclusive Interview with Germany's Fascist Chieftain

By MAX FRAENKEL

In this sensational interview, the only one which Germany's anti-Semitic leader has ever granted to a Jewish journalist, the mental poverty of Adolf Hitler is revealed in its entirety. Cornered by a few direct questions by the fearless interviewer who introduced himself unceremoniously in a restaurant, the Nazis' chief candidly lays bare his arrogant, unreasoning hatred of the Jews and definitely stamps himself as an intolerant ignoramus.—THE EDITOR.

Berlin—In a Hallensee meeting hall some forty minutes from the Potsdamer Platz, transformed by an enterprising owner into a kind of beer restaurant, an obliging waiter whispered into my ear, with ill-concealed awe: "Da sitzt der Fuhrer" (There sits the Leader).

About a long wooden table bare of cloth a group of rather young-looking men were gathered. Their voices, loud, animated, outshouted one another except when he, the Leader, spoke. Then, as if by magic, complete silence fell not only over this one table but throughout the entire hall. He, the Leader, sensing that even his private conversation was regarded as a public address, raised his voice and put into play his extraordinary oratorical technique. Looking at his vis-a-vis, apparently unconcerned about the intense spotlight centered around his personality, the Leader, Adolf Hitler, spoke in a well-modulated voice, pausing from time to time to swallow an imposing-looking stein of beer.
Adolf Hitler's pictures do not do justice to the uncontested leader of the National Socialists. He looks much younger than his forty-one years. His athletic figure, his military bearing, his fresh complexion, his authoritative expression, which is enhanced by his thin, pointed, aggressive mustache, give one the impression of a German officer of pre-war days in civilian clothes.

When I introduced myself he stiffened. His entourage studied his countenance so as to know whether to make room for me. But Hitler did not seem inclined to speak to a newspaper correspondent in front of his young followers. He motioned to the Oberkellner and asked him to show us into a sort of private office on the same floor. There, a little less stiffly but still business-like, he asked me: "What is it you want to know?"

My first question, without any introductory preamble, was: "Is anti-Semitism a plank of the political platform of the Nazis?"

Hitler blinked at my query, and asked: "Do you represent a Jewish paper?" I explained that I was interested in obtaining a clear idea of his stand because I was making a study of anti-Semitism in Europe. Speaking with a noticeable Bavarian accent, the leader of the Nazis then said:
"I don't like to give interviews. I am a newspaperman myself and know how easily one's words are distorted. But since you are here I shall answer some of your questions, it being understood that I represent my personal views. The rules of my party prohibit the issuing of statements unless they are approved by our inner council."

I was unable to suppress a smile as I thought of Hitler's dictatorial power. Guessing the reason for my apparent skepticism, Hitler added:

 "We are a disciplined party. As a matter of fact, the Nationalist-Socialists are the best-disciplined political body in the Reich.

 "Anti-Semitism," he continued, "is not, as such, a part of our program. Our program is to purge Germany of all such elements as hinder its return to normal conditions. Germany must become a land for Germans, for free German citizens, not for German slaves dominated by Jewish capital."

 The interviewer interposed: "As one who has lived in Germany for many years I know that Jewish capital plays an unimportant role in the economic life of the country. In the great industries, in the manufacturing and of course in the agricultural phases of Germany life Jews play a minimal part. What, then, do you mean by 'German slaves dominated by Jewish capital'?"

 The would-be dictator of Germany was in no hurry to reply. Slowly, emphasizing every word, he said: "When I speak of Jewish capital, Jewish politics and Jewish domination I do not necessarily mean Jews. I mean, rather, all that is not truly German. The Jews have infected culture and German politics with their views. By trying to transform themselves into Germans they have turned Germans into Jews. They influence business and politics with their internationalistic ideas. The only way in which Germans who have become infected with Judeophilia can be saved is by labeling everything un-German Jewish."

 "In other words, you are making the German Jew the victim, the scapegoat of your policy,''I observed.

 "No," replied the Leader. "They are a real menace."

 "How can less than one per cent of the total population be a threat to the nation? There are only about half a million Jews in this country of almost seventy millions," I continued.

 "Your figures are not exactly correct, but a few tens of thousands one way or the other make little difference. However, how about the Communists in Russia? Though their percentage in the total population is smaller than that of the Jews here they control the country."

 "What do you propose to do about this Jewish 'menace'?" I countered.

 Hitler smiled, but the smile did not soften his stern expression. With quiet determination he made this statement: "I intend to do nothing against the Jews except carry on the educational campaign I have prosecuted during the last few years. But whatever the National-Socialist Party will do to carry out its political program it will do in a constitutional way. German life must be purged of all foreign elements that distort the true German spirit. The government must be in the hands of Germans intent upon but one goal: to liberate Germany from its present slavery. This can be done by instilling into Germans their lost self-respect and their faith in their own abilities. The propaganda which we carry on is aimed to elevate German self-confidence."

 "Are you serious when you advocate the wholesale expulsion of Jews from Germany?" I inquired squarely.

 Unhesitatingly the Leader replied:"I do want to get rid of"—he used the word loswerden—"those Jews who since the War have invaded our country from Eastern Europe and undermined our morale by mad speculation, who are devoid of all patriotism and have made fortunes out of our national catastrophe. As for the rest, I merely want to limit their influence by passing legal prohibitions against their participation in the Government and by eliminating from public life such non-Jews as act as puppets for Jewish capital."

 "Can you name any such 'puppets'?"

 "I would call the entire Bruening Cabinet a Jewish cabinet. I qualify the Stressemann foreign policy a Jewish policy. I designate the Berlin police department as Jewish. The humiliating surrender of German interests to our former enemies is due entirely to Jewish influence."

 "Do you, then, consider pacifism a Jewish quality or defect specifically?"

 "I am a pacifist myself," was the surprising rejoinder of the man who seven years ago tried to capture the governmental reins of Bavaria by means of a military putsch. "By pacifism I"— he stressed the "I" in dramatic fashion —"understand the maintenance of peace as long as one's national honor is unsoiled. The Jewish view of peace, because of the international Jewish mind, means the surrender of all pride for the sake of financial interests.""Sometimes the anti-Semites accuse the Jews of militarism," I remarked, "and sometimes they charge them with noxious pacifism; at other times the Jews are accused as destroyers of all law and order, while only the other day Count Salm, the uncle of your Austrian colleague Prince Starhemberg, called anti-Semitism a revolutionary movement because Jews always support the conservative property-loving classes of their country. How do you reconcile all this?"

By that time it appeared that Adolf Hitler was becoming annoyed at the persistent questioning. It seemed to dawn upon him that this interlocutor, notwithstanding his blond hair and blue eyes, must be a Jew. With a careful gesture the German Mussolini reassured himself that the immaculate part in his hair had not been disturbed. He rose and, adopting his favorite platform position — firmly taking hold the edge of the table with both hands— spoke slowly: "I do not have to go into details. My views are known. I am the only German leader who is not afraid to speak out. I am concerned with the Jews only in so far as they obstruct the realization of the ideal German Reich. But I will countenance no mob action, even against Jews. I never did. We have been made the scapegoat for the undisciplined mob action of the Communists. Jews have nothing to fear from us as long as they do not mix with us. This they must learn— and I think they are learning very fast since the last elections. As long as the Jews here will not try to pose as Germans and have the temerity to speak for Germans, they will be unmolested. That is all I have to say on the subject."

The leader of the second-largest parliamentary party in Germany, whose name has become synonymous with anti-Semitism throughout Central Europe, drew himself up, bowed slightly and strode out to rejoin his companions. As he approached, his party rose and a youngster in a brown shirt with sleeve adorned with the swastika stretched out his arm in the traditional Fascist salute.

Dec. 7, 2013

Why “nice” is a weak concept among people in the desperate situation we are in. It allows questionable persons, events and organizations to pass unremarked upon because “it wouldn’t be nice” to point out their less than confidence-building behavior. There are many, many like this and they don’t want people noticing, so they rush to the defense of one-like-themselves who is being “investigated.”

Carolyn points out that Adolf Hitler did not believe in “nice,” but he spoke of the importance of selecting the right people who had the courage to make decisions, not for the benefit of an individual, but for the benefit of the whole. At that time, he did the first selecting, so it worked. Today, we don’t have someone with his enormous talent and courage, but we could look to him as a model.  Special topics covered:

• John Friend and his emails: Carolyn responds to JF’s blog post
  

• The fallacy of thinking everyone is working for the same goal

• Adolf Hiter’s Platterhof Speech: How significant is it?
  

The Incredible Ignorance of so many in the pro-White network about the Holocaust, Hitler and WW2 in general, but who insist on talking about it as if they should be listened to.

They do great damage to their listeners, and in many cases uncritical fans, by passing on their ignorance and even acting like they know better than well-known persons who are actually knowledgeable.

Dec. 30, 2013

In the last show of this year, Hadding Scott comes on with Carolyn in the 2nd hour to discuss whether there ever was, or could be, such a thing as “Black Nazis,” and other questions about  National Socialism. In the first hour Carolyn emphasizes the need for continuing to destroy the holocaust lies because of the enormous damage it does to the psyches of the German people.  Some highlights:

• David Irving did say in 2007 that “In my opinion the real killing operations took place in the Reinhardt camps … Heinrich Himmler’s men killed possibly as many as 2.4 million in the two years up to 1943.”
• TheBNP goes after Goebbels, Eichmann and Mengele with crude propaganda;
• Manfred Roeder’s eloquent Introduction to Thies Christophersen’s The Auschwitz Lie;
• Hadding Scott reads from the National-Socialist Political Primer on racial rules, which remained substantially the same from 1933 to 1945;
• What Hitler said in the Platterhof  speech was identical to what was in that manual;
• Veronica Clark’s focus on Blacks in Germany is “much ado about nothing” when it comes to real historical scholarship.
  

Rodney Martin, Tule River Indian Reservation's Tribal Administrator, talks to the press in November 2007 about the tribe's purchase of a card room license.

By Carolyn Yeager

On March 15, 2007, two months after he accepted the full-time position as Tribal Administrator for the Tule River Indian Tribe, whose Reservation was close to Porterville, California, Rodney Martin penned the following [my emphases -cy] ein the Porterville Recorder, a newspaper in which he would continue to write op-eds and editorial comments in the following years.

*       *       *

“I would like to weigh in on the comments of Mr. and Mrs. Day concerning Mrs. Jennie Perez’s letter to the editor. While I will not put words into Mrs. Perez’s mouth, I believe the intent of her letter was a message of embracing diversity. What a novel idea, given we are the nation with the Statue of Liberty in New York Harbor that welcomes people from all lands.

The degree of intellectual dishonesty demonstrated by both letters from the Days was shocking, as they stated line after line in their letters about being an American without stating a single cohesive element of what really makes us Americans.

For the benefit of everyone, there is no such ethnicity as an American. There is no American bloodline, no American DNA test, and no American language. What makes us an American is our values, ideas and principles– which by the way can be expressed in Spanish, French, English, Chinese or any other native language that an American chooses to express himself or herself in – and above all our unique ability to come together as demonstrated nationally after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and here during the recent freeze.

Sadly, what is clear in the the letters from the Days is fear, fear of those who are different and the use of fear to divide people among ethnic lines in an “us versus them” argument that is more reminiscent of 1930s Germany than what America is really about. For this, I will pray for the Days that they will one day see diversity as a strength and love thy neighbor.

Rodney Martin, Porterville"

*       *      *

What makes this especially notable is Rodney Martin’s statements after the revelation of his January 2007 interview with the Porterville Recorder, in which he insisted the “black reporter” and the “Jew copy editor” knew that he was pro-White and had been found to be commenting on pro-White forums, and for that reason inserted the line into the published interview about his wife being a Cherokee Indian. Martin also said that those words came from him “as a sarcasm” but they (or sometimes only the Jew) kept it in the interview out of spite and hatred for Martin.

Clearly, from this editorial comment, Martin (the politician) is not telling the truth about this “Cherokee incident”, although so many WN’s believed him immediately.

Martin is siding with a Hispanic or Mestizo woman over the protests (written in two letters to the editor] of a White American couple named Day. Let’s also bring to mind that Martin formed what he calls the “American Nationalist Association” in league with John Friend, who after a few weeks dropped out of the venture.  Martin has continued it but combined it with the American Nationalist Network. When I once, following that,  referred to Martin as an “American Nationalist,”  he denied that he had ever described himself as that, but only as a National Socialist. Are you confused enough, yet? In 2007, National-Socialism was clearly not something Martin identified with, being he identified with “diversity” and “the Statue of Liberty that welcomes people from all lands,” including China. This was Rodney Martin’s America.

But this is not all. Another guest column by Martin, titled “Just Say No to Extremism,” appeared  in the Porterville Recorder on October 30, 2007. (Again, my emphases -cy.)

*      *      *

“Our community has been subjected recently to a barrage of news articles related to one “who shall remain nameless” in my article. This is on purpose because individuals of this kind thrive and indeed multiply on publicity. (Remember, not naming people is Martin’s hallmark -cy)

“First“he who shall remain nameless” used, without permission, The Recorder’s newspaper tubes to distribute hateful fliers promoting “a religion” that is nothing more than rhetoric parallel to Nazi and KKK propaganda. In fact “he who shall remain nameless” claims to be none other than a reverend: What a joke in and of itself. In fact this same reverend’s “religion” is promoted via an Internet Web site that states Adolf Hitler is a “great human being.” Get the idea where they look to for “saints”?

“Anyhow, The Recorder attempted to take legal action against “he who shall remain nameless,” all to no avail. See this “reverend” has freedom to distribute his hateful “theology” on other’s property, even if it is not wanted.

“Talk about an extreme telemarketer.

“Then the good “reverend” decided to distribute fliers on the business of a local Jewish shop owner, kind of reminiscent of the tactics Nazis used in Germany in the 1930s. Perhaps “he who shall remain nameless” is a student of history as well.

“Because we have hate crimes protection in our country, “he who shall remain nameless” was arrested, however, he was soon released, apparently for lack of evidence. It seems the “reverend” knows how to work the system.

“Then finally, we hear that once again this so-called man of the cloth has once again run afoul of the law. This time the good “reverend” was at a tavern, no doubt for communion, and was allegedly in an altercation that resulted in another individual being knifed.

“If this is the good reverend’s version of the sacrament, I can see why he has credibility issues in terms of being taken seriously as a legitimate man of the cloth.

“The larger problem with “he who shall remain nameless” is that — and people here in Porterville may not know it — this young man was sent here by this hate group, Creator Skinhead Movement, to agitate and divide this community along racial lines by using wedge issues.

“The moral challenge facing all of us is to NOT take the bait and to reject “he who shall remain nameless” and his intellectually dishonest ideology and recognize that there is no religion of hate. We must send them packing.

“We must also embrace our diversity and come together as a community to address issues facing us all. “He who shall remain nameless” likes to use hot-button issues like crime, gangs and drugs to divide us as a community. In fact, these issues are of concern to all of us and we must address them as a community, united so all of our children will be safe, secure and have a bright future, regardless of ethnicity and economic status.

“Finally, we as a community must act or risk the mistakes of history. We, as a community, must send a strong sense of outrage to “he who shall remain nameless” and his small gang of comrades that we are outraged by their tactics and they are not welcome in our community.

“We must not give them what they want. We must not recognize them as anything more then what they truly are, outsiders who come here to divide and spread hate and discontent.

“I close with the words of the Rev. Martin Niemoller, who lived to regret his inaction in Germany in the 1930s

First they came for the Jews

and I did not speak out

because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for the Communists

and I did not speak out

because I was not a Communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists

and I did not speak out

because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for me

and there was no one left

to speak out for me.”

Rodney Martin is the Tule River tribal administrator. He previously worked in city, state and federal governmental service. Mr. Martin also held Harry S. Truman and LBJ presidential fellowships. He can be reached at mail@rodneymartin.com.

*      *      *

Rodney Martin says he was raised by his German grandparents, who were members of the German-American Bund and who believed in National-Socialism and Hitler’s goals. He says his father was a friend of Pastor Butler, and his wife’s family are hard-core racists. He married his wife “Peggy” in 1995, yet in 2007 he was so anti-Hitler and promoting diversity?

Rodney may say, in response to this, that he was insincere in these public writings of his – for whatever reasons he might come up with – but don’t believe him. There is no way that can add up. Is Rodney Martin a government agent in the White Nationalist “movement?” Or does he work for the SPLC, shades of Veronica K. Clark (I’m somewhat joking here)? What about Deanna Spingola – is she in on all this too or does she just have incredibly bad instincts?

I know that as the messenger bringing you this bad news – as some of you will see it – I will be blamed for creating division. What a joke – I can only laugh at that. There are none so blind as those who refuse to see.

I will stop here and pick this up in one more blog post as soon as I can get back to it. There are a few more Porterville newspaper items to tie into this story, particularly about how Martin got hold of so much money, but we all need a little time to digest what has already been revealed about Rodney Martin from his own pen. And maybe see how creative (or not) he will be in “splaining” it. ~

Feb. 15, 2015

Margaret Huffstickler joins me again to discuss the extent and nature of the LIES we loyal White have to deal with on a regular basis. Our topics ranged from Hollywood movies to Internet gossip on Facebook, and much in between.

• The latest big Hollywood propaganda film, The Monuments Men, is a distortion about Adolf Hitler planning to either own or destroy all the greatest art treasures in the world;
• Lies and misunderstanding about the Gestapo, and how/why it was created, are dispelled by Margaret in her article from Vincent Reynouard's research in the Jan-Feb 2012 issue of The Barnes Review;
• More detail about the Kevin Alfred Strom case is revealed, proving that he was never convicted of pedophilia in any way, shape or form, and has been unfairly demonized– he even has all along retained custody of his 3 children;
• Who is “Larry Slimes” and who is  Christopher John Borsella? Carolyn shares what she could find about Christogianni’s multicultural and anti-racist past, and other peculiarities.
• More multi-racial websites put up or joined by Christogianni Borsella:  Mediterranean League at Wiser.org and Communist Party of Pakistan.
  

March 3, 2014

This program marks the fourth anniversary of The Heretics’ Hour, which began on March 1, 2010 on the Voice of Reason Network. Carolyn addresses the need for a consistent message from those who have a platform to speak to White people and points out where the message is most dangerously inconsistent. Major points made:

• The behavior of people who cannot defend themselves from charges made against them vs behavior of those who can;
• Paul Eisen and Gilad Atzmon as human rights advocates whose “liberal” Jewish views about Germans stop at the Adolf Hitler/”Nazi” line;
• Revisionist Michael Hoffman, a Roman Catholic, also abhors Hitler and tells lies about him, thus keeping religion above race;
• Rodney Martin’s page at Metapedia– how it came to be;
• Martin’s brand of activism – speaking at an IHR meeting (see photo at right) and writing letters to U.S. senators on behalf of a U.S.-German peace treaty;
• Martin’s exchange with a German who was trying to correct him about a German/U.S. peace treaty.

Image: The Three Stooges?Rodney Martin, Mark Weber, David Cole -- three flawed messengers with three different flawed messages.

March 6, 2014

Carolyn Yeager and Ray Goodwin use their first program to introduce listeners  to some background information on this collection of what are basically after-lunch-or-supper monologues by Adolf Hitler in the company of his intimate circle.

• How trustworthy is this text, since Martin Bormann assigned two of his aides to take the notes during meals, then turn them over to him for “checking” and safekeeping;
• Why it is valuable to study this book;
• Questions about the translation and translators – for example, did Francois Genoud tamper with the parts about Christianity;
• Of those offended by this book, Christians are #1 on the list, complaining that it does not agree with Hitler’s “public record” of positive remarks about Christianity in earlier years;
• David Irving and Albert Speer both confirmed that these recorded talks are authentically Hitler; Richard Carrier disagrees;
  
• Next week we’ll begin reading the text.

The edition being used was translated by Norman Cameron and R.H. Stevens, published by Enigma Books, New York, and can be found as a pdf here.

March 13, 2013

Carolyn Yeager and Ray Goodwin read and comment on theSat. July 5th through July 15th, 1941 dinner table monologues by the German Fuehrer, as taken down by an adjutant and checked for accuracy by Martin Bormann. Some highlights from the program:

• Russians do not naturally incline toward a Western, Aryan type of organized state;
• Expansion into the East will create new tourist destinations reachable by autobahn;
• Moscow must disappear and Bolshevisim be exterminated;
• The dominion of natural law, no education in atheism, Christianity less tolerant than the ancient world;
• Moral law governs the actions of Germans, making them uniquely capable of a revolution in religion;
• Racial migrations, and “way of eating” a typically racial characteristic;
• Stalin an extraordinary figure in history.

Image:July 1941. A proud time: Hitler with Field Marshal Keitel and Reichsmarschall Goering (far right) in conversation with Knight's Cross winner Werner Mölders (left). [click on image to enlarge]

The edition being used was translated by Norman Cameron and R.H. Stevens, published by Enigma Books, New York, and can be found as a pdf here.

March 17, 2014

A program featuring two anniversaries and three “enemies inside the gate. We must keep reminding ourselves and others that those who call themselves “the good guys” are just the opposite, and who the good guys really are. Some highlights:

• New York St. Patrick’s Day Paradeorganizers forbade the display of LGBT signs and displays, causing the new Mayor Blasio to boycott the parade — ditto the Guinness and other beer companies;
• The real joy of the Austrian-Germans to join the German Reich is still denied and lied about today, in order to uphold the false WWII/evil “Nazis” narrative;
• Adolf Hitler’s speech on March 15, 1938 at Vienna’s Heldenplatz to 200,000 rapt listeners declared that bringing the oldest eastern province back into the Reich was his “greatest accomplishment”;
• Dietrich Bonhoeffer, young ecumenical pastor of the “Confessing Church” which opposed the National-Socialist attempt to create a National German Christian Church,  was an early opponent of the Hitler regime who ended up a full traitor with the German “Resistance”;
• Pastor Martin Niemoeller, author of “First they came for the communists” and one of the founders of the Confessing Church,  first supported the National-Socialists, then decided he opposed the “Aryan Paragraph” which had existed since 1885;
• Edward Miliband, 45-year old son of Polish Jewish parents who emigrated to Britain in 1940 and 1947, is now an MP for Doncaster North and head of the Labour Party;
• Carolyn reads a column written by him in 2012 that reveals how Miliband manages to tell both the British and the British Jews what he wants each of them to hear.

Image:Ed Miliband, leader of the Labour Party in Britain and a 100% Polish Jew with no British blood, explains why he's good for Britain.

March 22, 2014

Can one proclaim to be a National-Socialist and at the same time look to Russian President Vladimir Putin as the “new leader” that Whites can rally around? Carolyn doesn’t think so and says why, plus Bob from DC  calls in the 2nd hour with additional information and opinions. Some highlights:

• How racially-minded is Putin – How much communist egalitarianism has stuck with him;
• Can any Slavic nationalist ever deny the Holocaust, or even revise it, like non-Slavic Eastern nationalists, such as Hungary, do;
• Michael Colhaze favors the Christian Slavs over the atheist West, even though bureaucratic corruption is a fact of life;
• Putin’s father was a communist party true-believer and Putin joined the KGB directly upon university graduation;
• Alexander Dugin, sometime advisor to Putin, heads a Eurasian Alliance that wants to assure the cultural diversity of all the peoples of the world;
• Nat-Socialism’s “race eugenics” (sterilization law) was begun in 1933 to purify the German racefrom habitual criminal, feeble-minded and insane hereditary factors;
• The U.S., Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland also had sterilization laws, while Hungary, UK, Switzerland, Poland, Japan, Latvia and Estonia were considering it.